Comparison
Riz cuisson rapide vs Riz complet
Overall, Riz cuisson rapide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz cuisson rapide | Riz complet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz cuisson rapide has 71% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
- Riz cuisson rapide has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Riz complet has 62% more fiber (3.9 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Riz cuisson rapide
Riz long étuvé de qualité supérieure.
Riz complet
100% riz long grain complet étuvé de qualité supérieure (origine Italie)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz cuisson rapide or Riz complet?
Overall, Riz cuisson rapide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz complet has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz cuisson rapide has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.