Comparison

Riz Basmati Bio vs Basmati & Wild Rice

Overall, Riz Basmati Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz Basmati BioBasmati & Wild Rice
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 351 kcal 107 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 2.6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.9 g 3 g
Protein 7.5 g 3.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Basmati & Wild Rice has 69% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 351 kcal).
  • Riz Basmati Bio has 77% less fat (0.6 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Riz Basmati Bio has 69% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Basmati & Wild Rice has 84% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Basmati & Wild Rice has 38% more fiber (3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Riz Basmati Bio has 58% more protein (7.5 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Riz Basmati Bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Riz Basmati Bio

Riz long de qualité supérieure issu de l'agriculture biologique,

Basmati & Wild Rice

Natural Wholegrain Basmati Rice Steamed (89%), Natural Wild Rice Steamed (10%), Rice Bran Oil, Acacia Fibre

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz Basmati Bio or Basmati & Wild Rice?

Overall, Riz Basmati Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Basmati & Wild Rice has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Basmati & Wild Rice has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons