Riz Basmati Bio vs Basmati & Wild Rice
Overall, Riz Basmati Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Basmati Bio | Basmati & Wild Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Basmati & Wild Rice has 69% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 351 kcal).
- Riz Basmati Bio has 77% less fat (0.6 g vs 2.6 g).
- Riz Basmati Bio has 69% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Basmati & Wild Rice has 84% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Basmati & Wild Rice has 38% more fiber (3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Riz Basmati Bio has 58% more protein (7.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Riz Basmati Bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Riz Basmati Bio
Riz long de qualité supérieure issu de l'agriculture biologique,
Basmati & Wild Rice
Natural Wholegrain Basmati Rice Steamed (89%), Natural Wild Rice Steamed (10%), Rice Bran Oil, Acacia Fibre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Basmati Bio or Basmati & Wild Rice?
Overall, Riz Basmati Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Basmati & Wild Rice has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Basmati & Wild Rice has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.