Riz au lait nature vs Rice Pudding classic
Overall, Rice Pudding classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz au lait nature | Rice Pudding classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rice Pudding classic has 14% less fat (2.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Rice Pudding classic has 15% less sugar (9.3 g vs 11 g).
- Rice Pudding classic has 18% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Riz au lait nature lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Riz au lait nature
Lait entier 65%, eau, riz 10%, sucre 9%, amidon de riz, crème, poudre de lait écrémé, sel. Traces de gluten.
Rice Pudding classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Rice Pudding classic?
Overall, Rice Pudding classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rice Pudding classic has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rice Pudding classic has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 11 g per 100 g.