Risotto au poulet aux champignons vs Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes
Overall, Risotto au poulet aux champignons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Risotto au poulet aux champignons
Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Risotto au poulet aux champi... | Risotto au poulet et aux cèp... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 114 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto au poulet aux champignons has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Risotto au poulet aux champignons lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Risotto au poulet aux champignons
Eau, bouchées de blanc de poulet traité en salaison 14% [blanc de poulet 11.9% (origine : France), eau, dextrose, fécule de pommes de terre, sel], riz 13%, crème de riz (eau, riz), crème fraîche (contient _lait_), champignons de Paris 4.2%, oignons frits (oignons, huile d'olive vierge, sel), amidon de riz, vin blanc, fromage à pâte dure (contient _lait_), huile de colza, farine de _blé_, sel, ciboulette, poudre de champignons 0.1%, poudre de cèpes, poivre.
Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Risotto au poulet aux champignons or Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes?
Overall, Risotto au poulet aux champignons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risotto au poulet et aux cèpes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.