Comparison

Rinse appelstroop vs Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g

Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRinse appelstroopCanisius Echte Peren-Appelst...
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 286 kcal 272 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 60 g 56 g
Salt 0.1 g —
Fiber 6 g 5.4 g
Protein 1.7 g 0.2 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rinse appelstroop has no fat, while Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g has 0.5 g.
  • Rinse appelstroop has no saturated fat, while Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g has 0.3 g.
  • Rinse appelstroop has 88% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.2 g).

Ingredients

Rinse appelstroop

geconcentreerd suikerbietensap, concentreerd appelsap, citroensap, geleermiddel: pectine.

Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g

Geconcentreerd sap van peren en appels, geleermiddel: pectine, citroensap.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rinse appelstroop or Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g?

Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Canisius Echte Peren-Appelstroop uit Limburg 450 g has less sugar: 56 g versus 60 g per 100 g.

More comparisons