Rinse appelstroop vs Stroop van peren en appels
Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rinse appelstroop | Stroop van peren en appels |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 60 g | 56.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinse appelstroop has 27% more fiber (6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Rinse appelstroop has 29% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Rinse appelstroop
geconcentreerd suikerbietensap, concentreerd appelsap, citroensap, geleermiddel: pectine.
Stroop van peren en appels
Fruitstroop (van peren en appels), geleermiddel: pectine, citroensap
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rinse appelstroop or Stroop van peren en appels?
Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stroop van peren en appels has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stroop van peren en appels has less sugar: 56.1 g versus 60 g per 100 g.