Rings goût oignon vs Sticks de pois cassés
Overall, Sticks de pois cassés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rings goût oignon | Sticks de pois cassés |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 481 kcal | 455 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 8.6 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticks de pois cassés has 14% less fat (18 g vs 21 g).
- Sticks de pois cassés has 55% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Sticks de pois cassés has 38% more fiber (8.6 g vs 5.3 g).
- Sticks de pois cassés has 54% more protein (16 g vs 7.3 g).
- Sticks de pois cassés has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rings goût oignon lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Rings goût oignon
Semoule de maïs 64%, huile de colza, farine de blé 7,6%, poudre d'oignon 6%, son de blé, poudre de lait écrémé, sel, arômes naturels, lactosérum en poudre (dont lait), persil, sucre, colorant : curcumine.
Sticks de pois cassés
Farine de pois cassés* 70%, farine de riz*, huile de tournesol*, fibre de pomme*,paprika* 1%, farine de maïs*, sel, sirop de glucose déshydraté*, oignon*, algues*,ail*, tomate*, racine de livèche*, poivre noir*, sel fumé. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rings goût oignon or Sticks de pois cassés?
Overall, Sticks de pois cassés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticks de pois cassés has fewer calories: 455 kcal versus 481 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rings goût oignon has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.