Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer vs Hähnchenbrustfilet
Overall, Hähnchenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken mit Steak... | Hähnchenbrustfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has 20% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 122 kcal).
- Hähnchenbrustfilet has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Hähnchenbrustfilet has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Hähnchenbrustfilet has 24% more protein (25 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, 0,5 % Pfeffer schwarz, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Hähnchenbrustfilet
Hähnchenfleisch', Meersalz, Traubenzucker', Sonnenblumenöl, Gewürzextrakte¹, Branntweinessig', Stabilisator (Natriumcitrate), Antioxidationsmittel (Natriumascorbat), Konservierungsstoff (Natriumnitrit)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer or Hähnchenbrustfilet?
Overall, Hähnchenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.