Rindersaftschinken vs Chorizo
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken | Chorizo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 476 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 42 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 14.5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersaftschinken has 79% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 476 kcal).
- Rindersaftschinken has 95% less fat (2 g vs 42 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 94% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 14.5 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 71% less sugar (1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 40% less salt (2.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Chorizo
GE NATUREL AU BOIS DE HÊTRE AVEC PIMENT DE MURCIE BOYAU NATUREL FUMA FR CHORIZO DOUX PUR PORC NGREDIENTS: Maigre et poitrine de porc (145 g de viandes de porc fraiches pour obtenir 100 g de chorizo) sel, piment doux (traces éventuelles de nitrate), lactose, sirop de glucose de mais, dextrose de mais, épices. Traitement de surface: Conservateurs E-202, E-235. Contient lait et dérivés, Tra éventuelles de soja. Boyau de porc comestible. Produit sulet à perte de poids par atmosphère protectrice. Fermeture du boyau par agrafe nétallique. A retirer avant de consommer. A conserve ans un endroit frais et sec ou refrigéré. A consommer te préférence avant / lot: Voir emballage dessiccation. Conditionné sQUS
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken or Chorizo?
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersaftschinken has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.