Rindersaftschinken vs Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken | Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 418 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 34.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 12.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersaftschinken has 76% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 418 kcal).
- Rindersaftschinken has 94% less fat (2 g vs 34.9 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 93% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 12.2 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 75% less sugar (1 g vs 4 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 53% less salt (2.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring
PORK, Salt, Dextrose, Dried Oregano, Antioxidant: Sodium Erythorbate; Garlic Paste, Rosemary Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into a Natural Pork Casing. MADE WITH 136g OF RAW PORK PER 100g OF FINISHED PRODUCT. ALLERGY ADVICE: May contain Milk. NUTRITION TYPICAL VALUES Energy - Fat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken or Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring?
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersaftschinken has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken has less sugar: 1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.