Comparison

Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring vs Lomo embuchado

Overall, Lomo embuchado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMild Spanish Chorizo RingLomo embuchado
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 418 kcal 199 kcal
Fat 34.9 g 5 g
Saturated fat 12.2 g 1.9 g
Sugars 4 g 0.5 g
Salt 4.5 g 3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 21.3 g 38 g
Additives34
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lomo embuchado has 52% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 418 kcal).
  • Lomo embuchado has 86% less fat (5 g vs 34.9 g).
  • Lomo embuchado has 84% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 12.2 g).
  • Lomo embuchado has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Lomo embuchado has 33% less salt (3 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Lomo embuchado has 44% more protein (38 g vs 21.3 g).
  • Lomo embuchado has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring

PORK, Salt, Dextrose, Dried Oregano, Antioxidant: Sodium Erythorbate; Garlic Paste, Rosemary Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into a Natural Pork Casing. MADE WITH 136g OF RAW PORK PER 100g OF FINISHED PRODUCT. ALLERGY ADVICE: May contain Milk. NUTRITION TYPICAL VALUES Energy - Fat

Lomo embuchado

Lomo de cerdo, sal, pimentones, dextrosa, ajo, antioxidantes (E-331, E-301), aromas y conservadores (E-250, E-252).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mild Spanish Chorizo Ring or Lomo embuchado?

Overall, Lomo embuchado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lomo embuchado has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lomo embuchado has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons