Comparison

RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD vs Rillettes de Canard en cocotte

Overall, RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Mas...Rillettes de Canard en cocot...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 378 kcal 396 kcal
Fat 34 g 38 g
Saturated fat 11 g 13 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 18 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has 11% less fat (34 g vs 38 g).
  • RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has 15% less saturated fat (11 g vs 13 g).
  • Rillettes de Canard en cocotte has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD

Viande de canard 52% (origine : UE), graisse de canard 21% (origine : UE), maigre de porc (origine : France), viande cuite de cou de canard 16% (origine : UE), sel, poivre.

Rillettes de Canard en cocotte

Viande de canard 55%, graisse de canard, viande de porc, tissu conjonctif de porc, tissu conjonctif de canard, sel, épices et plantes aromatiques (muscade, poivre, ail, thym), Canard 83%, Viande de canard et viande de porc origine Union Européenne,

FAQ

Which is healthier: RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD or Rillettes de Canard en cocotte?

Overall, RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has fewer calories: 378 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

RILLETTES DE CANARD 220G Massif TRAD has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons