Comparison

Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut vs Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche

Overall, Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRice Cakes Milk Chocolate &...Tortitas de arroz con chocol...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 505 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 26 g 17 g
Saturated fat 16 g 11 g
Sugars 27 g 28 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.5 g
Fiber 8.4 g 2.4 g
Protein 7.6 g 7.1 g
Additives12
AllergensMilk, Sesame seeds, SoybeansMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche has 35% less fat (17 g vs 26 g).
  • Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche has 31% less saturated fat (11 g vs 16 g).
  • Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has 71% more fiber (8.4 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Only Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut

60% dark chocolate (45,8% cocoa paste, 40,7% red sugar, 13,2% cocoa butter, emulsifier, soy lecithins, vanilla aroma), 39,5% rice, sesame seeds, salt,

Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche

Chocolate con leche 55% [azúcar, manteca de cacao, leche entera en polvo, pasta de cacao, suero lácteo (leche), emulgente (lecitina de soja), aroma], arroz (44%), sal. Trazas de frutos de cáscara.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut or Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche?

Overall, Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tortitas de arroz con chocolate con leche has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 505 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has less sugar: 27 g versus 28 g per 100 g.

More comparisons