Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut vs Galette de riz chocolat
Overall, Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut
Galette de riz chocolat
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate &... | Galette de riz chocolat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 505 kcal | 497 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 27 g | 30 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Sesame seeds, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galette de riz chocolat has 13% less saturated fat (14 g vs 16 g).
- Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has 10% less sugar (27 g vs 30 g).
- Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has 67% more fiber (8.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut
60% dark chocolate (45,8% cocoa paste, 40,7% red sugar, 13,2% cocoa butter, emulsifier, soy lecithins, vanilla aroma), 39,5% rice, sesame seeds, salt,
Galette de riz chocolat
Chocolat au lait 60 % (sucre, beurre de cacao, lait en poudre 15,2 %, pâte de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithine (soja), arôme naturel de vanille), riz complet 40 %
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut or Galette de riz chocolat?
Overall, Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galette de riz chocolat has fewer calories: 497 kcal versus 505 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rice Cakes Milk Chocolate & Coconut has less sugar: 27 g versus 30 g per 100 g.