Comparison

Remoulade vs Salsa di pere candite

Overall, Salsa di pere candite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRemouladeSalsa di pere candite
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 601 kcal 287 kcal
Fat 64.2 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 4.8 g 0 g
Sugars 3.7 g 66 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.2 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, MustardMustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salsa di pere candite has 52% fewer calories (287 kcal vs 601 kcal).
  • Salsa di pere candite has 100% less fat (0.3 g vs 64.2 g).
  • Salsa di pere candite has no saturated fat, while Remoulade has 4.8 g.
  • Remoulade has 94% less sugar (3.7 g vs 66 g).
  • Salsa di pere candite has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Remoulade has 67% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Remoulade is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Remoulade lists: Eggs.
  • Only Salsa di pere candite lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Remoulade

Remoulade mit 65% Rapsöl : Rapsöl 65 %, Wasser, Branntweinessig Senf(Wesse Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Gewürze), Zucker Eigelb* 2,2 %, Kräuter, Stärke, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmital (Ctronensäure), Antioxidationsmittel (Calcium-OinatriumEUTA) *Eier aus Bodenhaltung eretor

Salsa di pere candite

Pere 54%, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio, aroma senape, antiossidante: anidride solforosa.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Remoulade or Salsa di pere candite?

Overall, Salsa di pere candite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa di pere candite has fewer calories: 287 kcal versus 601 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Remoulade has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 66 g per 100 g.

More comparisons