Reine Buttermilch vs Butter milk amul
Overall, Butter milk amul has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Reine Buttermilch | Butter milk amul |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Butter milk amul has 36% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 36 kcal).
- Butter milk amul has 34% less sugar (2.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Reine Buttermilch has 59% more protein (3.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Butter milk amul has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Reine Buttermilch lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Reine Buttermilch
Buttermilch 100%
Butter milk amul
5ml
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reine Buttermilch or Butter milk amul?
Overall, Butter milk amul has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Butter milk amul has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 36 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Butter milk amul has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.