Comparison

Redes BBQ vs Bhujia

Overall, Redes BBQ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRedes BBQBhujia
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 515 kcal 564 kcal
Fat 29 g 40 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 10 g
Sugars 8.4 g 0 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.4 g
Fiber 6.3 g 0 g
Protein 4.4 g 20 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Redes BBQ has 28% less fat (29 g vs 40 g).
  • Redes BBQ has 72% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 10 g).
  • Bhujia has no sugar, while Redes BBQ has 8.4 g.
  • Bhujia has 24% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Redes BBQ has 100% more fiber (6.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Bhujia has 78% more protein (20 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Redes BBQ has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Bhujia is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bhujia lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Redes BBQ

Harina de maíz, aceite de girasol alto oleico, aromas [sustancias aromatizantes, aroma de humo, potenciador de sabor (E621), colorante (E160c), acidulante (E330)], azúcar, sal, gasificante (E500ii) y lima, Puede contener trazas de derivados lácteos y soja,

Bhujia

Tepary Beans Flour, Edible Vegetable Oil (Cotton Seed, Corn, Palmolein, Ground Nut and Rice Bran), Gram Pulse Flour, lodised Salt, *Spices & Condiments (Red Chilli Powder, Black Pepper Powder, Ginger Powder, Clove Powder, Mace Powder, Nutmeg Powder and Cardamom Powder). *Used as natural flavouring substances. Allergen Information: Contains Nut.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Redes BBQ or Bhujia?

Overall, Redes BBQ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Redes BBQ has fewer calories: 515 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bhujia has less sugar: 0 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons