Comparison

Red seedless grapes vs Rode druiven

Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Red seedless grapes	Rode druiven
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	73 kcal	76 kcal
Fat	0.1 g	0.2 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0.1 g
Sugars	17 g	16 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0.6 g	1.8 g
Protein	0.6 g	0.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Rode druiven has 67% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.6 g).

Ingredients

Red seedless grapes

Grapes

Rode druiven

Rode druiven (crimson seedless)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Red seedless grapes or Rode druiven?

Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Red seedless grapes has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rode druiven has less sugar: 16 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Black seedless grapes vs Red seedless grapes Red seedless grapes vs Seedless black grapes Black seedless grapes vs Red seedless grapes Red seedless grapes vs Seedless Black Grapes Sable Black Seedless Gra... vs Red seedless grapes Black seedless grapes vs Rode druiven Seedless black grapes vs Rode druiven Black seedless grapes vs Rode druiven