Black seedless grapes vs Rode druiven
Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Black seedless grapes | Rode druiven |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Black seedless grapes has 13% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Rode druiven has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rode druiven has 61% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Black seedless grapes
Not available.
Rode druiven
Rode druiven (crimson seedless)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Black seedless grapes or Rode druiven?
Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Black seedless grapes has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Black seedless grapes has less sugar: 15 g versus 16 g per 100 g.