Comparison

Black seedless grapes vs Rode druiven

Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlack seedless grapesRode druiven
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 66 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 15 g 16 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.7 g 1.8 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Black seedless grapes has 13% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 76 kcal).
  • Rode druiven has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Rode druiven has 61% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

Black seedless grapes

Not available.

Rode druiven

Rode druiven (crimson seedless)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Black seedless grapes or Rode druiven?

Overall, Rode druiven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Black seedless grapes has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Black seedless grapes has less sugar: 15 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons