Ranch Dressing vs Garlic Powder
Overall, Garlic Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 10 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ranch Dressing | Garlic Powder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garlic Powder has 72% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Garlic Powder has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 43.3 g).
- Garlic Powder has 100% less saturated fat (0 g vs 3.3 g).
- Garlic Powder has 64% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Garlic Powder has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.9 g).
- Garlic Powder has 100% more fiber (5.8 g vs 0 g).
- Garlic Powder has 37% more protein (5.3 g vs 3.3 g).
- Garlic Powder has the better Nutri-Score.
- Garlic Powder is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Ranch Dressing lists: Eggs, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ranch Dressing
Nonfat buttermilk (whey, water, skim milk powder, corn starch, tapioca starch, carrageenan, locust bean gum, culture), vegetable oil (canola and/or soybean oil), egg yolk, maltodextrin, less than 2% of: dried garlic, dried onion, distilled vinegar, salt, sugar, green onion, spices, phosphoric acid, corn starch, xanthan gum, guar gum.
Garlic Powder
Garlic Powder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ranch Dressing or Garlic Powder?
Overall, Garlic Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garlic Powder has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garlic Powder has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.