Raifort d’Alsace Fort vs Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raifort d’Alsace Fort | Rolnik Raifort 200Ml |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | — |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has 12% less fat (3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Raifort d’Alsace Fort has 60% less sugar (4 g vs 10 g).
- Only Raifort d’Alsace Fort lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Raifort d’Alsace Fort
60% racines de raifort (origine France, Hongrie), eau, lait (origine France), huile de tournesol, sel, amidon modifié, acidifiant : acide citrique, épaississant: gomme xanthane, arôme naturel, conservateur: disulfite de sodium.
Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raifort d’Alsace Fort or Rolnik Raifort 200Ml?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raifort d’Alsace Fort has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raifort d’Alsace Fort has less sugar: 4 g versus 10 g per 100 g.