Raifort vs Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Overall, Raifort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raifort | Rolnik Raifort 200Ml |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | — |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raifort has 20% less fat (2.4 g vs 3 g).
- Raifort has 13% less sugar (8.7 g vs 10 g).
- Only Raifort lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Raifort
Raifort 60%, eau, sucre, vinaigre, huile de colza, épaississant : adipate de diamidon acéty sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, antioxydant DISULFITE DE SODIUM, Bacide L-ascorbique. Origine: Pologne
Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raifort or Rolnik Raifort 200Ml?
Overall, Raifort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 92 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raifort has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 10 g per 100 g.