Raifort prêt à l'emploi vs Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Overall, Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raifort prêt à l'emploi | Rolnik Raifort 200Ml |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 12.3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has 51% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has 76% less fat (3 g vs 12.3 g).
- Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has 89% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Raifort prêt à l'emploi has 42% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has 36% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Raifort prêt à l'emploi
Not available.
Rolnik Raifort 200Ml
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raifort prêt à l'emploi or Rolnik Raifort 200Ml?
Overall, Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rolnik Raifort 200Ml has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raifort prêt à l'emploi has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 10 g per 100 g.