Comparison

Queues de Lotte de Chine vs Lotte à l'Américaine

Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientQueues de Lotte de ChineLotte à l'Américaine
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — —
Calories 66 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.5 g
Sugars 0 g 1.2 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0.4 g
Protein 15 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Queues de Lotte de Chine has 41% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 111 kcal).
  • Queues de Lotte de Chine has 81% less fat (0.7 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Queues de Lotte de Chine has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Queues de Lotte de Chine has no sugar, while Lotte à l'Américaine has 1.2 g.
  • Queues de Lotte de Chine has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Lotte à l'Américaine has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).

Ingredients

Queues de Lotte de Chine

Not available.

Lotte à l'Américaine

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Queues de Lotte de Chine or Lotte à l'Américaine?

Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Queues de Lotte de Chine has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Queues de Lotte de Chine has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons