Queues de Lotte de Chine vs Lotte à l'Américaine
Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Queues de Lotte de Chine | Lotte à l'Américaine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has 41% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has 81% less fat (0.7 g vs 3.6 g).
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has no sugar, while Lotte à l'Américaine has 1.2 g.
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Lotte à l'Américaine has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Queues de Lotte de Chine
Not available.
Lotte à l'Américaine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Queues de Lotte de Chine or Lotte à l'Américaine?
Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queues de Lotte de Chine has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queues de Lotte de Chine has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.