Quest chips vs Lecitina di soia
Overall, Quest chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quest chips | Lecitina di soia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 438 kcal | 878 kcal |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 96 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 59.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quest chips has 50% fewer calories (438 kcal vs 878 kcal).
- Quest chips has 84% less fat (15.6 g vs 96 g).
- Quest chips has 78% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 14 g).
- Lecitina di soia has 33% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Lecitina di soia has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Quest chips has 99% more protein (59.4 g vs 0.5 g).
- Lecitina di soia is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Quest chips lists: Milk.
- Only Lecitina di soia lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Quest chips
protein blend (milk protein isolate, whey protein isolate), high oleic sunflower oil, corn starch, calcium caseinate, soluble corn fiber, natural flavors, salt, sodium caseinate, tomato powder, onion powder, sugar, psyllium husk, buttermilk powder, yeast extract, garlic powder, citric acid, paprika extract (color), paprika, lactic acid, sunflower lecithin, spice, steviol glycosides (stevia), turmeric extract (color)
Lecitina di soia
lecitina di Soia
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quest chips or Lecitina di soia?
Overall, Quest chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quest chips has fewer calories: 438 kcal versus 878 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lecitina di soia has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.