Quargel vs Bioberger
Overall, Quargel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quargel | Bioberger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 423 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.8 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quargel has 71% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 423 kcal).
- Quargel has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 35 g).
- Quargel has 99% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 23 g).
- Bioberger has 47% less salt (2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Quargel has 10% more protein (30 g vs 27 g).
- Bioberger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bioberger lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Quargel
Sauermilchtopfen, Salz, Säureregulatoren Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Calciumcarbonat, Paprikapulver, Kasereikulturen.
Bioberger
Milch, Speisesalz, Milchsäurebakterienkulturen, Labaustauschstoff.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quargel or Bioberger?
Overall, Quargel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quargel has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quargel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.