Putenhacksteaks vs Pechuga de pavo
Overall, Pechuga de pavo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Putenhacksteaks | Pechuga de pavo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pechuga de pavo has 62% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 258 kcal).
- Pechuga de pavo has 96% less fat (0.8 g vs 20 g).
- Pechuga de pavo has 94% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pechuga de pavo has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Pechuga de pavo has 28% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Pechuga de pavo has 35% more protein (22 g vs 14.3 g).
- Pechuga de pavo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Putenhacksteaks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Putenhacksteaks lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Putenhacksteaks
flüssig gewürzte Putenhacksteaks 92% [Putenfleisch 80%, Trinkwasser, Paniermehl (_Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, Hefe), Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze (Zwiebel, Paprika, Chili, Pastinake, Koriander, Pfeffer, Knoblauch, Ingwer), Sonnenblumenöl, Putenfett, _Vollmilchpulver_, Liebstöckel, Gewürzextrakte (enthält _Senf_), Kochsalzersatz Kaliumchlorid, Säuerungsmittel: Apfelsäure], Rapsöl, Gewürze, Sheafett, Speisesalz, Gewürzextrakte, Basilikum
Pechuga de pavo
Pechuga de pavo (90%), agua, sal, aromas, dextrosa, cloruro potásico, gelificante (carragenanos), antioxidante (eritorbato sódico), conservador (nitrito sódico) y aroma de humo. Puede contener trazas de derivados de LECHE y SOJA. Envasado en atmósfera protectora. Manténgase entre 0*C y 5ªC. Consumir preferentemen - te antes del/ Lote: (ver envase).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Putenhacksteaks or Pechuga de pavo?
Overall, Pechuga de pavo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pechuga de pavo has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pechuga de pavo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.