Putenhacksteaks vs Filet de dinde
Overall, Filet de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Putenhacksteaks | Filet de dinde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 137 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de dinde has 47% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 258 kcal).
- Filet de dinde has 72% less fat (5.6 g vs 20 g).
- Filet de dinde has 67% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filet de dinde has 63% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Filet de dinde has 32% more protein (21 g vs 14.3 g).
- Only Putenhacksteaks lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Putenhacksteaks
flüssig gewürzte Putenhacksteaks 92% [Putenfleisch 80%, Trinkwasser, Paniermehl (_Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, Hefe), Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze (Zwiebel, Paprika, Chili, Pastinake, Koriander, Pfeffer, Knoblauch, Ingwer), Sonnenblumenöl, Putenfett, _Vollmilchpulver_, Liebstöckel, Gewürzextrakte (enthält _Senf_), Kochsalzersatz Kaliumchlorid, Säuerungsmittel: Apfelsäure], Rapsöl, Gewürze, Sheafett, Speisesalz, Gewürzextrakte, Basilikum
Filet de dinde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Putenhacksteaks or Filet de dinde?
Overall, Filet de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de dinde has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de dinde has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.