Purée de carottes cuisinée vs Organic mamia
Overall, Purée de carottes cuisinée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Purée de carottes cuisinée | Organic mamia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Purée de carottes cuisinée has 23% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Organic mamia has 69% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Organic mamia has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Purée de carottes cuisinée has 62% less sugar (3.4 g vs 9 g).
- Organic mamia has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Purée de carottes cuisinée has 37% more fiber (3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Purée de carottes cuisinée has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Purée de carottes cuisinée has the better Nutri-Score.
- Organic mamia is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Purée de carottes cuisinée lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Purée de carottes cuisinée
Carottes 94.4%, crème fraîche (LAIT) 5%, sel, poivre. Traces éventuelles de céleri.
Organic mamia
ORGANIC APPLE PURÉE (68%), ORGAN CARROT PURÉE (22%), ORGANIC PARSNIP PURÉE (10%), Organic Concentrated Lemon Juice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Purée de carottes cuisinée or Organic mamia?
Overall, Purée de carottes cuisinée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Purée de carottes cuisinée has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Purée de carottes cuisinée has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 9 g per 100 g.