Comparison

Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron vs Puree gourmande

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPurée d'artichaut à l'aneth...Puree gourmande
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 70 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 3 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 2 g 1 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 4.2 g 1.8 g
Protein 2.6 g 5.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron has 18% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 85 kcal).
  • Puree gourmande has 40% less fat (1.8 g vs 3 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 56% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron has 57% more fiber (4.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 52% more protein (5.4 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron

Artichauts 46%, lait demi-écrémé, pommes de terre, crème fraîche, fécule de manioc, sel, jus de citron 0,6%, aneth 0,4%. Fabriquée dans un atelier qui utilise du céleri.

Puree gourmande

Eau, lentilles corail* 20%, carottes* 16%, crème* entière stérilisée UHT 7%, sel marin, purée d'ail, cumin*. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir des traces de gluten, soja, céleri et graines de sésame.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron or Puree gourmande?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Purée d'artichaut à l'aneth et jus de citron has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Puree gourmande has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons