Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin vs Crumpet
Overall, Crumpet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Préparation pour crêpes au s... | Crumpet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 168 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crumpet has 52% fewer calories (168 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- Crumpet has 81% less fat (0.7 g vs 3.7 g).
- Crumpet has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Crumpet has 19% less sugar (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Crumpet has 68% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.8 g).
- Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin has 59% more fiber (5.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin has 56% more protein (13.7 g vs 6 g).
- Crumpet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin
sarrasin 93 %, farine de sarrasin, farine de blé, sel de guérande, levure sèche désactivée,
Crumpet
Farine de blé 47% (farine de blé, carbonate de calcium, niacine, fer, thiamine), eau, poudres à lever : diphosphate de sodium, carbonate de sodium et chlorure de calcium, levure, farine de blé fermenté, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Préparation pour crêpes au sarrasin or Crumpet?
Overall, Crumpet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crumpet has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crumpet has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.