Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage vs Adukibonen
Overall, Adukibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage
Adukibonen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Préparation d'haricot rouge... | Adukibonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 157 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 33.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 12.7 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 19.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has 52% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 329 kcal).
- Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Adukibonen has 93% less sugar (2.4 g vs 33.1 g).
- Adukibonen has 78% more protein (19.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Adukibonen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Adukibonen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage
HARICOT ROUGE, SUCRE, SEL, SORBITOL,PHOSPHATE DE DIAMIDON
Adukibonen
biologische adukibonen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage or Adukibonen?
Overall, Adukibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Adukibonen has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 33.1 g per 100 g.