Haricots Azukis vs Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage
Overall, Haricots Azukis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Haricots Azukis
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots Azukis | Préparation d'haricot rouge... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 33.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has 49% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 309 kcal).
- Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Haricots Azukis has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 33.1 g).
- Haricots Azukis has 78% more protein (20 g vs 4.4 g).
- Haricots Azukis has the better Nutri-Score.
- Haricots Azukis is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Haricots Azukis
Haricots Azukis biologiques.
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage
HARICOT ROUGE, SUCRE, SEL, SORBITOL,PHOSPHATE DE DIAMIDON
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots Azukis or Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage?
Overall, Haricots Azukis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Préparation d'haricot rouge sucré en grain - Yude Azuki Tei Kanmi Shiage has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots Azukis has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 33.1 g per 100 g.