Comparison

Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine vs Confiture Mirabelles

Overall, Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPréparation de mirabelles de...Confiture Mirabelles
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 196 kcal 243 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0 g
Sugars 48 g 59 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has 19% fewer calories (196 kcal vs 243 kcal).
  • Confiture Mirabelles has no fat, while Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has 0.5 g.
  • Confiture Mirabelles has no saturated fat, while Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has 0.5 g.
  • Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has 19% less sugar (48 g vs 59 g).
  • Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine

65% mirabelles de Lorraine, sucre de canne, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant: pectines. Présence exceptionnelle de noyaux.

Confiture Mirabelles

Mirabelles*, sucre, sucre roux de canne, jus de citrons concentré, gélifiant : pectines de fruits. Préparée avec 50 g de fruits pour 100 g de produit fini. Teneur totale en sucres : 60 g pour 100 g.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine or Confiture Mirabelles?

Overall, Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Préparation de mirabelles de Lorraine has less sugar: 48 g versus 59 g per 100 g.

More comparisons