Comparison

Potato pops signature vs Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena

Overall, Potato pops signature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPotato pops signaturePatatine al sale marino e ac...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 183 kcal 494 kcal
Fat 8.5 g 29 g
Saturated fat 1 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.7 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.6 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 2.5 g 6.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Potato pops signature has 63% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 494 kcal).
  • Potato pops signature has 71% less fat (8.5 g vs 29 g).
  • Potato pops signature has 58% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Potato pops signature has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Potato pops signature has 44% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena has 59% more protein (6.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Potato pops signature has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Potato pops signature

Pommes de terre (89%), huile de tournesol (8,5%), pommes de terre déshydratées, sel, dextrose, extrait de poivre noir.

Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena

Patate, olio di semi di girasole, sale, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP, maltodestrina, zucchero, fecola di patate, acido citrico; aroma naturale

FAQ

Which is healthier: Potato pops signature or Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena?

Overall, Potato pops signature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Potato pops signature has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 494 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Potato pops signature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons