Potatismjöl vs Fecola di patate
Overall, Fecola di patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Potatismjöl | Fecola di patate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fecola di patate has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Fecola di patate has no saturated fat, while Potatismjöl has 0.5 g.
- Potatismjöl has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Fecola di patate lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Potatismjöl
Potatisstärkelse
Fecola di patate
fecola di patate per dolci e salati, per addensare le tue creme e rendere soffici i tuoi dolci, modalità d'uso: la fecola di patate è utile in cucina in sostituzione o integrazione della farina per ottenere impasti più soffici, delicati e leggeri, trova applicazioni come addensante per cioccolate, budini e creme, oppure per la preparazione di salse, minestre e gnocchi, conservare in luogo fresco, asciutto e privo di odori, da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il: vedi sopra, si potato starch for sweet and savoury dishes, to thicken creams and for soft desserts, method of application: potato starch is useful in the kitchen as a substitute or addition to flour for softer, more brittle and lighter mixtures, it can be used as a thickener for chocolate, puddings and creams, or in the preparation of sauces, stews and potato dumplings, store in a cool, dry and odour-free place, best before: see above, the picture is symbolic, valori nutrizionali medi per average nutritional value per average nutritional value on tre mulina hr starch from krumpira for sweet and salty fir, namized for burning custard fittings and how your cakes would be metane, method of need: krumpir starch is useful in the kitchen, kao mjena or dodatak brašnu how you get a mexis, her liking and lying tijesta, possible to take advantage of the chao loser for hot chocolates, puddings and creams, ili zapremu umaka, soup and gnocchi, keep cold and dry to: sees mountains, silka is symbolic, b grassi - fats - masti di cui acidi grassi saturi - of which saturated fats - from kos saturated mass acids carboidrati - carbohydrates - carbohydrates - ugljikohydrates 1365 kj energia - energy value - energy
FAQ
Which is healthier: Potatismjöl or Fecola di patate?
Overall, Fecola di patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Potatismjöl has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Potatismjöl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.