Comparison
Mąka ziemniaczana vs Potatismjöl
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mąka ziemniaczana | Potatismjöl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 324 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mąka ziemniaczana has no fat, while Potatismjöl has 0.5 g.
- Mąka ziemniaczana has no saturated fat, while Potatismjöl has 0.5 g.
- Potatismjöl has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- Potatismjöl has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Mąka ziemniaczana
Skrobia ziemniaczana
Potatismjöl
Potatisstärkelse
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mąka ziemniaczana or Potatismjöl?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Potatismjöl has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 324 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mąka ziemniaczana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.