Porto aguila tawny vs Mirin rice wine
Overall, Porto aguila tawny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Porto aguila tawny | Mirin rice wine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 35 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Porto aguila tawny has 84% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Porto aguila tawny has 79% less sugar (9.2 g vs 43 g).
- Only Porto aguila tawny lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Porto aguila tawny
Raisins (SULFITES), álcool d´origine viticole, régulateurs d´acidité (acide tartrique (L(+)-), conservateurs (SULFITES), agents stabilisateurs (acide métatartrique, gomme arabique)
Mirin rice wine
Maize glucose syrup, water, rice, alcohol, corn syrup
FAQ
Which is healthier: Porto aguila tawny or Mirin rice wine?
Overall, Porto aguila tawny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Porto aguila tawny has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Porto aguila tawny has less sugar: 9.2 g versus 43 g per 100 g.