Comparison
Mirin rice wine vs Kochalkohol
Overall, Kochalkohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirin rice wine | Kochalkohol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kochalkohol has 95% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Mirin rice wine has no fat, while Kochalkohol has 0.5 g.
- Kochalkohol has no sugar, while Mirin rice wine has 43 g.
- Mirin rice wine has no salt, while Kochalkohol has 1.2 g.
- Kochalkohol has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Kochalkohol is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kochalkohol lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mirin rice wine
Maize glucose syrup, water, rice, alcohol, corn syrup
Kochalkohol
Wasser, Reis, WEIZEN, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirin rice wine or Kochalkohol?
Overall, Kochalkohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kochalkohol has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kochalkohol has less sugar: 0 g versus 43 g per 100 g.