Comparison
Kochalkohol vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine
Overall, Kochalkohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kochalkohol | Shaoxing Cooking Wine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shaoxing Cooking Wine has no fat, while Kochalkohol has 0.5 g.
- Kochalkohol has no sugar, while Shaoxing Cooking Wine has 0.9 g.
- Kochalkohol has 21% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Only Kochalkohol lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kochalkohol
Wasser, Reis, WEIZEN, Salz.
Shaoxing Cooking Wine
Rice Wine 98.5%, Salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kochalkohol or Shaoxing Cooking Wine?
Overall, Kochalkohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shaoxing Cooking Wine has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kochalkohol has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.