Comparison

Shaoxing Cooking Wine vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 ml

Nutrient	Shaoxing Cooking Wine	Shaoxing Cooking Wine
Nutri-Score	—	—
NOVA group	3	3
Calories	10 kcal	10 kcal
Fat	0 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0.9 g	0.9 g
Salt	1.5 g	1.5 g
Fiber	0 g	0 g
Protein	0.6 g	0.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Ingredients

Shaoxing Cooking Wine

Rice wine 98.5% (Water 59.1%, Rice 39.4%), Salt.

Shaoxing Cooking Wine

Rice Wine 98.5%, Salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Shaoxing Cooking Wine or Shaoxing Cooking Wine?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Shaoxing Cooking Wine has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 10 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Shaoxing Cooking Wine has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Mirin rice wine vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine Porto aguila tawny vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine Kochalkohol vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine Shaoxing Cooking Wine vs Vino Shaoxing Cooking Wine vs Vino Mirin rice wine vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine Porto aguila tawny vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine Kochalkohol vs Shaoxing Cooking Wine