Comparison
Shaoxing Cooking Wine vs Vino
Overall, Vino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Shaoxing Cooking Wine | Vino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vino has no calories, while Shaoxing Cooking Wine has 10 kcal.
- Vino has no sugar, while Shaoxing Cooking Wine has 0.9 g.
- Vino has no salt, while Shaoxing Cooking Wine has 1.5 g.
- Shaoxing Cooking Wine has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Only Vino lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Shaoxing Cooking Wine
Rice wine 98.5% (Water 59.1%, Rice 39.4%), Salt.
Vino
Vino Blanco y sulfuroso
FAQ
Which is healthier: Shaoxing Cooking Wine or Vino?
Overall, Vino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vino has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 10 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.