Comparison
Mirin rice wine vs Vino
Overall, Vino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirin rice wine | Vino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vino has no calories, while Mirin rice wine has 216 kcal.
- Vino has no sugar, while Mirin rice wine has 43 g.
- Vino is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Vino lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Mirin rice wine
Maize glucose syrup, water, rice, alcohol, corn syrup
Vino
Vino Blanco y sulfuroso
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirin rice wine or Vino?
Overall, Vino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vino has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vino has less sugar: 0 g versus 43 g per 100 g.