Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea vs Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry
Overall, Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea | Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has 70% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 19 kcal).
- Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has no fat, while Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry has 0.5 g.
- Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has 75% less sugar (1.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea
Water, agave nectar, black tea, citric acid, stevia leaf extract (Reb A), natural flavor, caffeine from green tea, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6), cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12).
Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry
Water, Sugar, Acid (Citric Acid), Tea Extract (0.12%), Raspberry Juice from Concentrate (0.1%), Flavouring, Acidity Regulatory (Trisodium Citrate), Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), Sweetener (Steviol Glycosides from Stevia).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea or Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry?
Overall, Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pop-Tarts Carnage Iced Tea has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.