Comparison

Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry vs Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry

Overall, Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientIced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberr...Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 1 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat — 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 4.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives85
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has 93% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 19 kcal).
  • Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has no fat, while Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry has 0.5 g.
  • Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has no sugar, while Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry has 4.5 g.
  • Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry

Citric acid, maltodextrin, corn syrup solids*, instant tea, malic acid, aspartame**, acesulfame potassium, contains less than 2% of natural flavor, sodium citrate, magnesium oxide, red 40, yellow 5, blue 1.

Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry

Water, Sugar, Acid (Citric Acid), Tea Extract (0.12%), Raspberry Juice from Concentrate (0.1%), Flavouring, Acidity Regulatory (Trisodium Citrate), Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), Sweetener (Steviol Glycosides from Stevia).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry or Lipton Ice Tea Raspberry?

Overall, Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Iced Tea Drink Mix, Raspberry has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons