Pommes de terre sautées vs Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip
Overall, Pommes de terre sautées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pommes de terre sautées
Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre sautées | Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblau... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 88 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre sautées has 32% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Pommes de terre sautées has 68% less fat (2.4 g vs 7.6 g).
- Pommes de terre sautées has 67% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip has 39% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Pommes de terre sautées
Not available.
Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip
Kartoffeln, Knoblauch-Dip (Rapsöl, Wasser, _Eigelb_¹, _Joghurterzeugnis_, Knoblauch 5 %, Zucker, Branntweinessig, Basilikum, Gewürze, Speisesalz, _Senfsaaten_, Dextrose, Sonnenblumenöl, Verdickungsmittel: Xanthan; Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumsorbat, Natriumbenzoat), Rapsöl, Speisesalz. ¹Eier aus Bodenhaltung
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre sautées or Snack-Kartoffeln mit Knoblauch-Dip?
Overall, Pommes de terre sautées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre sautées has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre sautées has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.