Comparison

Pollen Lettsaltet vs Pannekaker

Overall, Pannekaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPollen LettsaltetPannekaker
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group — —
Calories 628 kcal 126 kcal
Fat 52 g 3.4 g
Saturated fat 11 g 0.8 g
Sugars 5 g 3 g
Salt 1.8 g 0.7 g
Fiber 8 g 1.9 g
Protein 24 g 6.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pannekaker has 80% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 628 kcal).
  • Pannekaker has 93% less fat (3.4 g vs 52 g).
  • Pannekaker has 93% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 11 g).
  • Pannekaker has 40% less sugar (3 g vs 5 g).
  • Pannekaker has 60% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Pollen Lettsaltet has 76% more fiber (8 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Pollen Lettsaltet has 71% more protein (24 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Pannekaker has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pollen Lettsaltet

Not available.

Pannekaker

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pollen Lettsaltet or Pannekaker?

Overall, Pannekaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pannekaker has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 628 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pannekaker has less sugar: 3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons