Pannekaker vs The coconut soft eye
Overall, The coconut soft eye has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pannekaker | The coconut soft eye |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- The coconut soft eye has no calories, while Pannekaker has 126 kcal.
- The coconut soft eye has no fat, while Pannekaker has 3.4 g.
- The coconut soft eye has no saturated fat, while Pannekaker has 0.8 g.
- The coconut soft eye has no sugar, while Pannekaker has 3 g.
- The coconut soft eye has no salt, while Pannekaker has 0.7 g.
- Pannekaker has 86% more protein (6.9 g vs 1 g).
- The coconut soft eye has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pannekaker
Not available.
The coconut soft eye
TO FIND THE COCON ЗИЯН 910 Элэ MOVA FRESH EXOTIC SOFT EASY PREMIUM SPECIAL CUT Importer: LINSAN IMEX s.r.o. 1) REMOVE THE LABEL 2) FIND THE BIGGEST EYES x✓ 3) STABBED THE STRAW INTO BIGGEST EYES 81932750 801090 MA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pannekaker or The coconut soft eye?
Overall, The coconut soft eye has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
The coconut soft eye has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
The coconut soft eye has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.