Comparison

Vego kebab vs The coconut soft eye

Overall, The coconut soft eye has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVego kebabThe coconut soft eye
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 220 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 0 g
Fiber — 2 g
Protein 27 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • The coconut soft eye has no calories, while Vego kebab has 220 kcal.
  • The coconut soft eye has no fat, while Vego kebab has 8.8 g.
  • The coconut soft eye has no saturated fat, while Vego kebab has 0.7 g.
  • The coconut soft eye has no sugar, while Vego kebab has 1.3 g.
  • The coconut soft eye has no salt, while Vego kebab has 1.3 g.
  • Vego kebab has 96% more protein (27 g vs 1 g).
  • The coconut soft eye has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Vego kebab lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Vego kebab

Vatten, _vetegluten_ 37%, åkerböna 7,5%, rapsolja, kryddor (spiskummin, paprikapulver, vitlök, svartpeppar, oregano, cayennepeppar, koriander), _havremjöl_, _vetemjöl_, havssalt. Ursprung vetegluten och åkerböna: Sverige. Förpackat i en skyddande atmosfär.

The coconut soft eye

TO FIND THE COCON ЗИЯН 910 Элэ MOVA FRESH EXOTIC SOFT EASY PREMIUM SPECIAL CUT Importer: LINSAN IMEX s.r.o. 1) REMOVE THE LABEL 2) FIND THE BIGGEST EYES x✓ 3) STABBED THE STRAW INTO BIGGEST EYES 81932750 801090 MA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vego kebab or The coconut soft eye?

Overall, The coconut soft eye has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

The coconut soft eye has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 220 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

The coconut soft eye has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons