Comparison

Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière vs Kartoffelknödel halb & halb

Overall, Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoêlée cuisinée à la printan...Kartoffelknödel halb & halb
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 69 kcal 106 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.8 g
Sugars 2.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.6 g
Fiber 3.4 g 0.8 g
Protein 2.1 g 1.3 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has 35% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 106 kcal).
  • Kartoffelknödel halb & halb has 62% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Kartoffelknödel halb & halb has 38% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Kartoffelknödel halb & halb has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has 76% more fiber (3.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has 38% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière

Not available.

Kartoffelknödel halb & halb

49% Kartoffeln, 44% Kartoffeistärke, modifizierte Stärke, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Emulgator (Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren¹), Rapsöl, Gewürze, Farbstoff (Riboflavin), Kurkuma. ¹ auf pflanzlicher Basis

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière or Kartoffelknödel halb & halb?

Overall, Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poêlée cuisinée à la printanière has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kartoffelknödel halb & halb has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons